Page 8 - i1052-5173-30-8
P. 8

E values are not necessarily equal to the   The CI tool (Fig. 6) provides a rapid, pre-  in the field, subject to poor precision, or
         finite strain. As reviewed in Ramsay and   cise, and accurate tool for estimating CI. In   arduous and time-consuming to do later in
         Huber  (1983),  determining  finite  strain   practical use on suitable rock faces, CI is   the lab. StraboTools lets the field geologist
         means understanding all of the possible   typically reproducible within 1 or 2 absolute   examine rock fabrics in situ or back in the
         deformation mechanisms (e.g., creep, grain-  percent (e.g., 15 ± 2). The values determined   lab with thin sections or cut slabs. Because
         boundary sliding, etc.). StraboTools does   by  the  CI  tool  match  those  determined  by   the app requires the user to capture an
         not give this information, but E correlates   point counting within the same range.  image and work on that same picture, it can
         with strain, and the EFE aligns well with                              be used to thoroughly document the data
         fabric, even fabrics that are too subtle to see   FIELD GEOLOGY IN 2020 AND   collected and can be reproduced or tested
         (Fig. 1). For an igneous rock, the EFE may   BEYOND                    on the same source by other scientists. The
         capture a subtle grain shape fabric or crys-  Using StraboTools can significantly en-  tools also record the location and orienta-
         tal alignment not evident in the field.  hance the practice of field geology by pro-  tion of the image, so it becomes more prac-
          There are several cautions  about using   viding objective ways to collect data types   tical to reproduce the actual field observa-
         EFEs. First, they are  highly sensitive  to   that are impractical or impossible to collect   tions at a later date.
         shadows and cracks or fractures. In tests on
         glacially polished outcrops, a low sun angle
         can produce an elongate EFE whose axis is
         perpendicular to the sun azimuth even when
         visible shadows are not apparent. It is good
         practice to work with evenly shadowed sur-
         faces. Second, although one can snap pho-
         tos of images from computer screens, many
         artifacts, such as moiré patterns and the
         rectangular nature of pixels, can affect the
         results. High-resolution original images
         should be used whenever possible.

         COLOR INDEX
          Color index (CI), the volume percent of
         dark minerals visible in an outcrop of plutonic
         rock, is commonly estimated in the field. In
         granitic rocks, dark minerals such as biotite,
         hornblende, clinopyroxene, Fe-Ti oxides, and
         titanite are  commonly easy  to  observe, but
         estimating their percentage by eye, especially
         when the percentage is small, is a notoriously
         difficult endeavor even for experienced
         observers. Comparison charts (Folk, 1951;
         Compton, 1985) are helpful, but it is still dif-
         ficult to estimate CI accurately or precisely by
         eye, with visual psychology playing a promi-
         nent role in introducing biases (Allen, 1956;
         Dennison and Shea, 1966).
          Accurate measurement of CI in the field
         could allow the delineation of zoning pat-
         terns that previously required laboratory or
         thin-section analysis. For example, the Half
         Dome and Cathedral Peak plutons in
         Yosemite National Park form a gradationally
         nested pair with a consistent inward decrease
         in CI that accompanies significant parallel
         changes in bulk composition (Bateman et al.,
         1988). The Cathedral Peak Granodiorite
         ranges from CI ~10 and SiO  ~68 wt% at its   Figure 6. The color index (CI) tool in use. The user takes a photograph of a clean,
                                                   shadow-free rock face and then uses the slider (lower left) to highlight the desired
                              2
         outer contact to CI ~4 and SiO  ~72 wt% at   pixels in red or blue. (A) Determination of CI in a leucocratic granodiorite. The CI is
                                2
         its inner. The gradual factor-of-two variation   displayed at upper right. A portion of the highlighted pixels has been erased to show
                                                   the unhighlighted image below. (B) Using the CI tool for quick estimation of the per-
         in CI is well within the typical error range of   centage of porosity, as represented by blue epoxy, in a sandstone. The left half of the
         visual CI estimates (see Fig. 1D) and would   image is the original photomicrograph; on the right half the slider has been adjusted
                                                   to highlight the epoxy. Dark inclusions represent ~3% of the image (as determined
         be difficult to pick up by visual means alone.  with the slider); thus, the porosity is 40%. Photomicrograph by Michael C. Rygel.
         8  GSA Today  |  August 2020
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13