Page 8 - i1052-5173-31-6
P. 8

A  174 − 156 Ma                                                      assimilation, to which pressure-based (not
                         Zedong Arc          Extension                          temperature-based) proxies such as Sr/Y and
                                            Backarc basin                       La/Yb from rocks filtered following Profeta
           sea                                          Gangdese magmatic lull
           level                                                                et al. (2015) are less sensitive.
                                                                                  Crustal thickness of 65–70 km between 44
                                                                                and 10 Ma based on trace-element geochem-
                                                            Lhasa   Terrane
                                                                                istry is similar to modern crustal thickness of
                                                                     Yeba       ~70 km estimated from geophysical methods
                                                                     volcanism  (Owens and Zandt, 1997; Nábělek et al., 2009)
                                   Neo-Tethys slab
                                accelerated                 asthenosphere       and are 10–20 km less than upper estimates of
                               slab rollback                 upwelling
                                                                                80–85 km (Wittlinger et al., 2004; Xu et al.,
                                                                                2015). Upper-crustal shortening persisted in
           B  90 − 70 Ma              Xigaze backarc ocean basin                southern Tibet until mid-Miocene time, but
                        Xigaze-Spong Arc                                        coeval rapid erosion (Copeland et al., 1995)
                                                             Gangdese Mountains
           sea                                                                  may have maintained a uniform crustal thick-
           level       amphibolite exhumation                                   ness. Our results are inconsistent with models
                                                  ocean basin
                                                                                that invoke net crustal thinning via orogenic
                                                         Lhasa   Terrane
                          (90−80 Ma)
                                                                                collapse (Dewey, 1988) beginning in the
                                                                                Miocene and continuing to present day (Ge et
                                                         asthenosphere          al., 2015). Rather, our results are consistent
                                                           upwelling  granulites  with interpretations of thick crust in southern
                                   Neo-Tethys Slab
                                slab rollback                       (90−81 Ma)  Tibet by middle Eocene time (Aikman et al.,
                                                                                2008; Pullen et al., 2011), which continued to
         Figure 4. Tectonic interpretation after Kapp and DeCelles (2019). (A) Middle–Late Jurassic accelerated
         slab rollback during formation of the Zedong Arc drives the opening of an extensional backarc basin.   thicken at depth due to the ongoing mass addi-
         This is consistent with the generation of the late-stage, juvenile (asthenosphere derived) Yeba volca-  tion of underthrusting India (DeCelles et al.,
         nics (Liu et al., 2018). (B) Late Cretaceous slab rollback results in the opening of a backarc ocean basin.
                                                                                2002) before, during, and after the Miocene
                                                                                onset of extension in southern Tibet (e.g.,
         of mantle lithosphere during the Miocene or   Hammersley and DePaolo, 2006) assuming a   Harrison et al., 1995; Kapp et al., 2005;
         Pliocene (Dewey et al., 1988; England and   depleted asthenospheric melt source with no   Sanchez et al., 2013). We favor a model in
         Houseman, 1988; Harrison et al., 1992;   contribution from the mantle lithosphere;   which continued crustal thickening at depth is
         Molnar et al., 1993). The timing of crustal   crustal thickness is then calculated based on   balanced by upper crustal thinning (Kapp and
         thickening in the late Paleogene temporally   an assumed geothermal gradient on the prem-  Guynn, 2004; DeCelles et al., 2007; Styron et
         corresponds to the termination of arc magma-  ise that a deeper, hotter Moho would result in   al., 2015), with excess mass potentially evacu-
         tism in southern Tibet at 40–38 Ma and may   more crustal assimilation than a shallower,   ated by ductile lower crustal flow (Royden et
         indicate that the melt-fertile upper-mantle   cooler Moho. In addition to using La/Yb to   al. 1997). In this view, late Miocene–Pliocene
         wedge was displaced to the north by shallow-  estimate Cenozoic crustal thickness, DePaolo   acceleration of rifting in southern Tibet
         ing subduction of Indian continental litho-  et al. (2019) use the flux-temperature model   (Styron et al., 2013; Sundell et al., 2013; Wolff
         sphere (Laskowski et al., 2017). Crustal thick-  to suggest that crustal thickening in southern   et al., 2019) is a consequence of the position of
         ening during the Paleogene may be attributed   Tibet was nonuniform based on Nd isotopes.   the leading northern tip of India (Styron et al.,
         to progressive shortening and southward   Specifically, they estimate crustal thickness   2015), because this region experiences local-
         propagation (with respect to India) of the   of 25–35 km south of 29.8° N until 45 Ma,
         Tibetan-Himalayan orogenic wedge as Indian   followed by major crustal thickening to   ized thickening at depth, which in turn
         crust was accreted in response to continuing   55–60 km by the early to middle Miocene.   increases the rate of upper crustal extension in
                                                                                order to maintain isostatic equilibrium.
         convergence. We interpret that thickening   Critically, they suggest that north of 29.9° N
         depended mainly on the flux of crust into the   the crust was at near modern thickness before
         orogenic wedge, as convergence between   45 Ma and that there was a crustal disconti-  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
                                                                                  We thank Chris Hawkesworth, Allen Glazner,
         India and Asia slowed by more than 40%   nuity between these two domains, which   two anonymous reviewers, and editor Peter Copeland
         between 20 and 10 Ma (Molnar and Stock,   Alexander et al. (2019) later interpret along   for their detailed critique of this work. We also thank
         2009), subsequent to peak crustal thickening   orogenic strike to the east based on Hf isoto-  Michael Taylor and Richard Styron for informal
         rates between 60 and 30 Ma.         pic data. In contrast, our results show that   reviews; Sarah George and Gilby Jepson for
          Estimates of crustal thickness based on   crustal thickening was already well under   insightful discussions on proxies for crustal thick-
         Sr/Y and La/Yb differ both in time and space   way by 45 Ma, potentially near modern   ness; and Caden Howlett and Aislin Reynolds for
                                                                                discussions of Tibetan tectonics during the 2019 field
         compared to estimates using radiogenic iso-  crustal thickness, and with no dependence   season as this research was formulated. KES was
         topes. Determining crustal thickness from   on latitude (Figs. 3B–3D and supplemental   partially supported by the National Science Founda-
         Nd or Hf relies on an extension of the flux-  material [see footnote 1]). Radiogenic iso-  tion (EAR-1649254) at the Arizona LaserChron
         temperature model of DePaolo et al. (1992),   topes such as Nd and Hf are not directly con-  Center. M.N.D. acknowledges support from National
         which calculates the ambient crustal temper-  trolled by crustal thickness and concomitant   Science Foundation grant EAR 1725002 and the
                                                                                Romanian Executive Agency for Higher Education,
         ature and assimilation required to produce   pressure changes. Rather, variability in Hf   Research, Development and Innovation Funding proj-
         measured isotopic compositions (e.g.,   and Nd is likely due to complex crustal   ect PN-III-P4-ID-PCCF-2016-0014.

         8  GSA Today  |  June 2021
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13