Page 29 - i1052-5173-30-12
P. 29

Hunt, A.G., and Ghanbarian, B., 2016, Percolation
                                                                                  theory for solute transport in porous media: Geo-
                                                                                  chemistry, geomorphology, and carbon cycling:
                                                                                  Water Resources Research, v. 52, p. 7444–7459,
                                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019289.
                                                             Figure 1. Predicted and   Hunt, A.G., and Sahimi, M., 2017, Flow, transport, and
                                                             observed variability of
                                                             precipitation, P, and   reaction in porous media: Percolation scaling, criti-
                                                             evapotranspiration,  ET,   cal path analysis and effective medium approxima-
                                                                       energy
                                                             ET/P, as a function of   tion: Reviews of Geophysics, v. 55, p. 993–1078,
                                                             PET/P = AI (aridity index).   https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RG000558.
                                                             Data from Gentine et al.   Hunt, A.G., Faybishenko, B.A., Ghanbarian, B.,
                                                             (2012). Figure is modi-
                                                             fied  from  Hunt  et  al.   Egli, M., and Yu, F., 2020, Predicting water cycle
                                                             (2020).              characteristics from percolation theory and obser-
                                                                                  vation: International Journal of Environmental
                                                                                  Research and Public Health, v. 17, no. 3, p. 734,
                                                                                  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030734.
                                                                                Levang-Brilz, N., and Biondini, M.E., 2003,
                                                                                  Growth rate, root development and nutrient up-
                                                                                  take of 55 plant species from the Great Plains
                                                                                  Grasslands, USA: Plant Ecology, v. 165, p. 117–
                                                                                  144, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021469210691.
        values  d > 3 that generate  ET >  P are not   be important in evaluation of sequestering   Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Porporato, A., Ridolfi, L., Isham,
               f
        used). What is new is the representation of   carbon and coupling global water and carbon   V., and Cox, D.R., 1999, Probabilistic modelling of
        predicted variability in ET based on experi-  cycles. Incorporating observations helps esti-  water balance at a point: The role of climate, soil
        mental d value at larger AI, not just AI = 1.  mate these complementary fluxes. We found   and vegetation: Proceedings of the Royal Society
               f
          Values of d  for grasses generate almost   that variability in the predicted water balance   of London, Series A, v. 455, p. 3789–3805, https://
                   f
                                                                                  doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1999.0477.
        the exact observed variability in ET/P at AI   due to variation in plant root fractal dimen-  Yang, Y., Donohue, R.J., and McVicar, T.R., 2016,
        = 1, but overestimate variability at larger AI.   sionality outweighs uncertainties/variation in   Global  estimation  of  effective  plant  rooting
        We  attribute  the discrepancy at  larger  AI   interception and surface run-off. Coupling   depth:  Implications for hydrological  modeling:
        mostly to the fact that low-end ET/P values   our long-term  percolation model  with the   Water Resources Research, v. 52, no. 10, https://
        come from grass species with d  around 1.9,   short-term stochastic infiltration model (e.g.,   doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019392.
                                 f
        typical for nearly 2D structures, being less   Rodriguez-Iturbe et al., 1999) might improve   Yu, F., and Hunt, A.G., 2017, Predicting soil forma-
        adapted to arid conditions, and more likely   predictions of water balance components and   tion  on  the  basis of  transport-limited  chemical
                                                                                  weathering: Geomorphology, https://doi.org/
        absent at larger AI. Our theoretical frame-                               10.1016/ j.geomorph.2017.10.027.
        work, together with experimentally deter-  optimization of plant productivity.  Yu, F., and Hunt, A.G., 2018, Damköhler number
        mined parameters d , generates a good upper                               input to transport-limited chemical weather-
                       f
        bound for ET/P from theory and its variabil-  REFERENCES CITED            ing calculations: ACS Earth & Space Chemis-
                                            Budyko, M.I., 1958, The heat balance of the earth’s
        ity as a function of AI.              surface: Washington, DC, U.S. Department of   try, v.  1,  p.  30–38,  https://doi.org/10.1021/
                                                                                  acsearthspacechem.6b00007.
          The most important theoretical limitations   Commerce, Weather Bureau.  Yu, F., Hunt, A.G., Egli, M., and Raab, G., 2019, Com-
        of applying percolation theory to water bal-  Gentine, P., D’Odorico, P., Linter, B.R., Sivandran, G.,   parison and contrast in soil depth evolution for
        ance modeling arise from the partitioning of   and Salvucci, G., 2012, Interdependence of climate,   steady-state and stochastic erosion processes: Pos-
        surface run-off and subsurface flow (and   soil, and vegetation as constrained by the Budyko   sible implications for landslide prediction: Geo-
        transpiration and interception), because these   curve: Geophysical Research Letters, v.  39,   chemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, v. 20, p. 2886–
                                              L19404, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053492.
        processes are  not obviously regulated by   Hunt, A.G., 2017, Spatio-temporal scaling of vegeta-  2906, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC008125.
        plants for optimizing NPP. The ability to pre-  tion growth and soil formation: Explicit predic-  Manuscript received 7 June 2020
        dict  contributions  of  surface run-off,  plant   tions: Vadose Zone Journal, https://doi.org/10.2136/  revised Manuscript received 27 July 2020
        interception, and subsurface flow would also   vzj2016.06.0055.         Manuscript accepted 5 aug. 2020
























                                                                                       www.geosociety.org/gsatoday  29
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32