Page 9 - i1052-5173-31-9

Solid Earth, v. 10, p. 537–559, https://doi.org/ R., eds., Geological Prior Information: Informing Rieke, M., Foerster, T., Geipel, J., and Prinz, T., 2012,
10.5194/se-10-537-2019. Science and Engineering: Geological Society, High-precision positioning and real-time data pro-
Caravaca, G., Le Mouélic, S., Mangold, N., L’Haridon, London, Special Publication 239, p. 57–75, https:// cessing of UAV-systems: ISPRS International
J., Le Deit, L., and Massé, M., 2019, 3D digital out- doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.239.01.05. Archives of the Photogrammetry: Remote Sensing
crop model reconstruction of the Kimberley out- Hodgetts, D., Seers, T., Head, W., and Burnham, and Spatial Information Sciences, v. XXX-
crop (Gale crater, Mars) and its integration into B.S., 2015, High performance visualisation of VIII-1, C22, p. 119–124, https://doi.org/10.5194/
virtual reality for simulated geological analysis: multiscale geological outcrop data in single soft- isprsarchives-XXXVIII-1-C22-119-2011.
Planetary and Space Science, v. 182, 104808, ware environment, in 77th EAGE Conference Simpson, A., Clogg, P., Díaz-Andreu, M., and
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2019.104808. and Exhibition 2015: European Association of Larkman, B., 2004, Towards three-dimensional
Chandler, J.H., and Fryer, J.G., 2005, Recording Geoscientists & Engineers, p. 1–5, https://doi non-invasive recording of incised rock art: An-
aboriginal rock art using cheap digital cameras .org/10.3997/2214-4609.201412862. tiquity, v. 78, p. 692–698, https://doi.org/10.1017/
and digital photogrammetry, in Proceedings of Howell, J.A., Martinius, A.W., and Good, T.R., S0003598X00113328.
CIPA (Comité International de la Photogrammét- 2014, The application of outcrop analogues in Snavely, N., Seitz, S.M., and Szeliski, R., 2006, Pho-
rie Architecturale [International Committee of geological modelling: A review, present status to tourism: ACM Transactions on Graphics, v. 25,
Architectural Photogrammetry], p. 193–198, and future outlook, in Martinius, A.W., Howell, p. 835, https://doi.org/10.1145/1141911.1141964.
https://www.cipaheritagedocumentation.org/ J.A., and Good, T.R., eds., Sediment-Body Ge- Tavani, S., Corradetti, A., Granado, P., Snidero, M.,
wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Chandler-Fryer- ometry and Heterogeneity: Analogue Studies for Seers, T.D., and Mazzoli, S., 2019, Smartphone:
Recording-aboriginal-rock-art-using-cheap-digital- Modelling the Subsurface: Geological Society, An alternative to ground control points for ori-
cameras-and-digital-photogrammetry.pdf (last London, Special Publication 387, p. 1–25, https:// enting virtual outcrop models and assessing
accessed 6 June 2021). doi.org/10.1144/SP387.12. their quality: Geosphere, v. 15, p. 2043–2052,
Chiaraluce, L., et al., 2017, The 2016 central Italy James, M.R., and Robson, S., 2012, Straightforward https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02167.1.
seismic sequence: A first look at the mainshocks, reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography Tavani, S., Pignalosa, A., Corradetti, A., Mercuri,
aftershocks, and source models: Seismological with a camera: Accuracy and geoscience appli- M., Smeraglia, L., Riccardi, U., Seers, T., Pavlis,
Research Letters, v. 88, p. 757–771, https://doi cation: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 117, T., and Billi, A., 2020, Photogrammetric 3D mod-
.org/10.1785/0220160221. el via smartphone GNSS sensor: Workflow, error
F03017, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002289.
Corradetti, A., Zambrano, M., Tavani, S., Tondi, E., James, M.R., and Robson, S., 2014, Mitigating sys- estimate, and best practices: Remote Sensing,
and Seers, T.D., 2021, The impact of weathering tematic error in topographic models derived v. 12, 3616, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213616.
upon the roughness characteristics of a splay of the Thiele, S.T., Grose, L., Cui, T., and Cruden, A.R.,
active fault system responsible for the massive 2016 from UAV and ground-based image networks: 2019, Extraction of high-resolution structural
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, v. 39,
seismic sequence of the Central Apennines, Italy: orientations from digital data: A Bayesian ap-
Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 133, p. 1413–1420, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3609. proach: Journal of Structural Geology, https://
p. 885–896, https://doi.org/10.1130/B35661.1. Jaud, M., Bertin, S., Beauverger, M., Augereau, E., doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2019.03.001.
Dabove, P., Di Pietra, V., and Piras, M., 2020, GNSS and Delacourt, C., 2020, RTK GNSS-assisted Triantafyllou, A., Watlet, A., Le Mouélic, S., Cam-
positioning using mobile devices with the android terrestrial SfM photogrammetry without GCP: elbeeck, T., Civet, F., Kaufmann, O., Quinif, Y.,
operating system: ISPRS International Journal of Application to coastal morphodynamics moni- and Vandycke, S., 2019, 3-D digital outcrop
Geo-Information, v. 9, https://doi.org/10.3390/ toring: Remote Sensing, v. 12, p. 1889, https:// model for analysis of brittle deformation and
ijgi9040220. doi.org/10.3390/rs12111889. lithological mapping (Lorette cave, Belgium):
Furukawa, Y., and Ponce, J., 2009, Accurate, dense, Jones, R.R., McCaffrey, K.J.W., Wilson, R.W., and Journal of Structural Geology, v. 120, p. 55–66,
and robust multiview stereopsis: IEEE Transac- Holdsworth, R.E., 2004, Digital field data acquisi- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2019.01.001.
tions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelli- tion: Towards increased quantification of uncer- Uradziński, M., and Bakuła, M., 2020, Assessment
gence, v. 32, p. 1362–1376, https://doi.org/10.1109/ tainty during geological mapping, in Curtis, A., of static positioning accuracy using low-cost
TPAMI.2009.161. and Wood., R., eds., Geological Prior Information: smartphone GPS devices for geodetic survey
Girardeau-Montaut, D., 2015, Cloud compare—3D Informing Science and Engineering: Geological points’ determination and monitoring: Applied
point cloud and mesh processing software: Open Society, London, Special Publication 239, p. 43– Sciences (Switzerland), v. 10, p. 1–22, https://doi
Source Project, https://www.danielgm.net/cc/ 56, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.239.01.04. .org/10.3390/app10155308.
(last accessed 6 June 2021). Pringle, J.K., Westerman, A.R., Clark, J.D., Drink- Wu, C., 2011, VisualSFM: A visual structure from
Hodgetts, D., Drinkwater, N.J., Hodgson, J., Kava- water, N.J., and Gardiner, A.R., 2004, 3D high- motion system: http://ccwu.me/vsfm/ (last accessed
nagh, J., Flint, S.S., Keogh, K.J., and Howell, J.A., resolution digital models of outcrop analogue 6 June 2021).
2004, Three-dimensional geological models from study sites to constrain reservoir model uncer-
outcrop data using digital data collection tech- tainty: An example from Alport Castles, Der- Manuscript received 5 Mar. 2021
niques: An example from the Tanqua Karoo dep- byshire, UK: Petroleum Geoscience, v. 10, p. 343– revised Manuscript received 19 May 2021
ocentre, South Africa, in Curtis, A., and Wood., 352, https://doi.org/10.1144/1354-079303-617. Manuscript accepted 25 May 2021

www.geosociety.org/gsatoday 9