Page 5 - i1052-5173-31-8
P. 5

82°E       84°E       86°E       88°E       90°E       92°E        94°E       96°E       98°E

                                                    Internal Drainage

                                                                                         Three Rivers
           32°N  Indus



            Sutlej

           30°N     
             S1    
        
                                      Yarlung






           28°N

             T.chron System
              Apatite (U-Th)/He
              Apatite FT  Elevation (km)
              Zircon (U-Th)/He
              Zircon FT   1 2 3 4 5 6  GPS Station
                                                                                                          100 km
                                             West                   East
                                                  400  200  0  200  400
                                             Distance from Center Along Small Circles (km)
         Figure 1. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission 90-m color shaded elevation map. Thermochronology data (Laskowski et al., 2018; Thiede and Ehlers, 2013) in
         Figure 4 are shown with thermochronometer type. Color scale bar indicates east-west position from swath profile in Figure 4. Open symbols—location in
         the hanging wall of a normal fault; white circles—GPS stations from Liang et al. (2013); dashed outlines—areas sampled for Figure 4; solid lines mark topog-
         raphy and precipitation in Figure 4A. Thick dotted lines mark centerline for distance measured along small circles in Figure 4A. Individual colored swaths
         sample dominant rivers in Figure 4B. Thick black lines are rivers and catchment areas for Sutlej, Indus, Yarlung, and Three Rivers, and zone of Internal
         Drainage. Red box shows location of Figure 2. Red symbol shows location of Figure S1 [see text footnote 1].

         primarily by understanding the exhumation   –directed extension are discussed by   the initiation age for one Gangdese Rift is ca.
         history of the footwalls of north-striking   Blisniuk et al. (2001), Kali et al. (2010),   16 Ma using zircon U-Th/He data (Burke et
         normal faults. One example is the northern   Langille et al. (2010), Yin and Taylor (2011),   al., 2021). The Gangdese Rifts become more
         Lunggar Rift that locally has up to 25 km of   Sundell et al. (2013), and Styron et al. (2015).  northwest striking in the western Lhasa ter-
         top-to-the-east  displacement  and initiated   Here we focus on the Gangdese Range of   rane, and rift-bounding faults are more linear
         in the middle Miocene with uniformly low   southern Tibet that locally has nine active   in map pattern with the westernmost rifts,
         slip rates (<1 mm/yr) (Sundell et al., 2013).   NNW-striking normal faults we refer to as   suggesting an increase in oblique (i.e., dex-
         In the late Miocene, slip rates of rift bound-  the Gangdese  Rifts, located north of the   tral strike-slip) motion (see Fig. S1  in  the
         ing faults increased up to 5 mm/yr begin-  IYS zone and west of Tangra Yum Co (Figs.   Supplementary Material ). The Gangdese
                                                                                                    1
         ning in the southern Lunggar Rift, and   1 and 3). A potential mechanism for their   Rifts cut several regional structures, includ-
         accelerated northward, perhaps in response   formation is discussed in Yin (2000).  ing the north-directed Great Counter Thrust
         to the northward underthrusting of India                               (GCT) and the south-directed Gangdese
         (Sundell et al., 2013; Styron et al., 2015).   GEOLOGY OF THE GANGDESE   Thrust (GT) (Yin et al., 1994) (Figs. 1 and 2).
         Rift-bounding normal faults in the Yadong   RANGE                      Crosscutting relationships—including the
         Gulu section of the Nyainqentanglha initi-  Locally, elevations for the Gangdese Range   timing of Kailas Formation deposition
         ated at ca. 8 Ma based on results using   exceed 7500 m, forming the southern bound-  between 26 and 23 Ma (Leary et al., 2016),
         40 Ar/ Ar thermochronology (Harrison et   ary of the internally drained region of the   the timing of slip across north-striking nor-
            39
         al., 1992). In southernmost Tibet near   Tibetan plateau (Figs. 1 and 5). The Gangdese   mal faults that cut the GCT (Sundell et al.,
         Xigaze, a north-trending dike was dated at   Rifts are active structures and are shorter in   2013), and the age of a crosscutting pluton
         18 Ma and is thought to represent the time   length than the seven more well-studied lon-  near the town of Lazi at ca. 10 Ma (Laskowski
         when east-directed extension initiated (Yin   ger rifts cutting the entire Lhasa terrane (e.g.,   et al., 2018)—are consistent with the GCT
         et al., 1994), but whether diking represents a   Tangra Yum Co Rift)—along-strike lengths   being active between 23 and 16 Ma.
         regional extensional event is debated. The   of the Gangdese Rifts are between 30 and 50   The south-directed GT (e.g., Yin et  al.,
         dynamic causes for the development of the   km. Detailed studies of the Gangdese Rifts   1994) carries plutonic rocks across a north-
         active structures accommodating east-west   are lacking, but a recent study concludes that   dipping shear zone.  Ar/ Ar thermochro-
                                                                                                40
                                                                                                    39
         1 Supplemental Material. Description of the methodology for projecting various data types onto the swath profiles in Fig. 4 along with Google Earth imagery for evidence
         of an increase in the strike-slip component of faulting along the Gangdese Rifts in western Tibet. Go to https://doi.org/10.1130/GSAT.S.14681367 to access the supple-
         mental material; contact editing@geosociety.org with any questions.
                                                                                        www.geosociety.org/gsatoday  5
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10