GSA home

Log In | GSA Community | GSA Store | Join GSA | Donate | Contact Us

GSA home

| GSA Community | GSA Store | Donate | Contact Us

GSA Critical Issue: Hydraulic Fracturing

Table of Contents


Hydraulic Fracturing Defined

Hydraulic Fracturing’s History
and Role in Energy Development

Potential Environmental Issues
Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing

Water Quality

Water Use

Triggered or Induced Seismicity

Regulation Issues

Staying Informed



Print PDF
The hydraulic fracturing critical issue will be periodically updated.

Comment Form

Comments requested here:

  1. Notify if there is a broken link;
  2. Recommend annotated references on hydraulic fracturing, with a link to the refereed journal. Article annotation limited to 75 words.
  3. Suggestions on related aspects of hydraulic fracturing to address in future revisions.
This comment section is not a discussion forum. GSA members are encouraged to start a thread on GSA's Open Forum, if desired.


Seismic Expression from Hydraulic Fracturing Figure 15:

Seismic Expression from Hydraulic Fracturing; Warpinski et al, 2005. Reproduced with permission of SPE; further reproduction prohibited without permission.

Injection of fluids deep into the earth can trigger small or moderate earthquakes. Oil and gas operations are responsible for two types of fluid injection: 1) injection of hydraulic fracturing fluids into the reservoir rock; and 2) disposal of waste fluids through deep well injection.

Hydraulic fracturing imparts pressures of several thousand pounds per square inch on reservoir rocks. The resulting fractures may extend several hundred feet away from the borehole (Fig. 15), but generally no more than that due to physical and technological limitations on the hydraulic fracturing process[38, 49]. The hydraulic fracturing process creates very small seismic events or earthquakes. Such microseismicity is generally too small for humans to feel or to cause surface damage [26], although it can be detected by monitoring instruments that are designed to precisely determine where the fractures have propagated. A number of studies, including one by the National Academy of Sciences, have determined that hydraulic fracturing does not create a significant earthquake risk [48].

Disposal of large volumes of waste fluids produced from hydraulically fractured rocks through deep-well injection has been documented to produce small earthquakes, generally less than magnitude 2.0 [48,]. However, in areas with high volumes and rates of injection into disposal wells, there have been dramatic increases in earthquakes magnitude 3.0 and greater [50]. Horizontal wells that have been hydraulically fractured typically produce large volumes of waste fluids (produced and flowback water). Deep disposal of any fluids can trigger earthquakes [48, 51]. Most, although not all, of such earthquakes have occurred in areas of long-term or continuous injection of wastewater. Fluids injected near a subsurface fault may reduce the frictional resistance that keeps faults from slipping. These small movements allow energy already stored in brittle rock to be released in earthquakes [52]. In some locations, sites of slowly accumulating forces in the earth resulting from natural geologic processes are already susceptible to seismic events (which is why it is referred to as “triggered seismicity”). Deep well injection of fluids has likely caused earthquakes in excess of magnitude 2.0 over the past several decades, including a magnitude 5.7 earthquake in 2011 in Oklahoma[54] and a sharp increase of earthquake frequency from 2012 to 2014 in Oklahoma [65]. Kansas has also experienced a marked increase in seismic activity in the last two years, including the state’s largest earthquake recorded at magnitude 4.9 in November 2014[64]. The potential for triggered seismicity with the increasing volume of wastewater disposal is unknown [48, 40, 55].

< BACK | top | NEXT >